Google Antitrust Trial Ends, Monopolies in Two Markets Ruled

Landmark Case Concludes

After a five-month hiatus, the landmark antitrust trial between the US Justice Department and Google resumed this week. Judge Amit Mehta presided over the case, which centered around allegations that Google violated antitrust law by spending billions of dollars to create illegal monopolies in search and search advertising.

Exclusive Agreements Found Illegal

The judge ruled on Monday that Google had indeed violated antitrust law by entering into exclusive agreements with other companies, such as Apple, Amazon, and Samsung. These agreements prevented competitors from accessing Google's search engine, giving Google an unfair advantage in the market.

A Major Blow to Google

The ruling is a major blow to Google, which has long dominated the search engine market. The company is now facing the prospect of having to restructure its business and pay billions of dollars in fines. It could also open the door to further antitrust lawsuits against Google in the future.

Conclusion

The Google antitrust trial is a significant development in the modern internet era. It sends a clear message that even the largest and most powerful companies are not immune to antitrust laws. The ruling could have far-reaching implications for the way that companies operate online, and it could lead to a more competitive and open internet.